Cirigliano v. UA Theatre Circuit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cirigliano v. UA Theatre Circuit, Inc.

232 A.D.2d 602, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11349

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D.2d 602 (Cirigliano v. UA Theatre Circuit, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cirigliano v. UA Theatre Circuit, Inc., 232 A.D.2d 602, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11349 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated October 31, 1995, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff has failed to come forward with evidence tending to establish that the defendant created the condition which caused her fall, or that the defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition. Thus, the court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp., 84 NY2d 967; Kaufman v Man-Dell Food Stores, 203 AD2d 532). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated October 31, 1995, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The plaintiff has failed to come forward with evidence tending to establish that the defendant created the condition which caused her fall, or that the defendant had actual or constructive knowledge of the condition. Thus, the court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Piacquadio v Recine Realty Corp., 84 NY2d 967; Kaufman v Man-Dell Food Stores, 203 AD2d 532). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D.2d 602, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cirigliano-v-ua-theatre-circuit-inc-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack