Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange

155 A.2d 134, 57 N.J. Super. 522
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided November 2, 1959·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

57 N.J. Super. 522 (1959)
155 A.2d 134

JOHN E. CIRASELLA, ET UX. (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 26, 1959.
Decided November 2, 1959.

*532 Mr. Arthur L. Troast argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Ward J. Herbert, of counsel).

Mr. Richard M. Sandler argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Alan V. Lowenstein, attorney; Mr. Sandler on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Judge Waugh.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange, 155 A.2d 134, 57 N.J. Super. 522 (N.J. Ct. App. 1959).

155 A.2d 134 (Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gabriel v. Borough of Paramus
212 A.2d 550 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)