Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange
This text of 155 A.2d 134 (Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JOHN E. CIRASELLA, ET UX. (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
*532 Mr. Arthur L. Troast argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Ward J. Herbert, of counsel).
Mr. Richard M. Sandler argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Alan V. Lowenstein, attorney; Mr. Sandler on the brief).
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Judge Waugh.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.2d 134, 57 N.J. Super. 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cirasella-v-village-of-so-orange-njsuperctappdiv-1959.