Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange
155 A.2d 134, 57 N.J. Super. 522
Opinion
JOHN E. CIRASELLA, ET UX. (AND 19 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
*532 Mr. Arthur L. Troast argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys; Mr. Ward J. Herbert, of counsel).
Mr. Richard M. Sandler argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Alan V. Lowenstein, attorney; Mr. Sandler on the brief).
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Judge Waugh.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange, 155 A.2d 134, 57 N.J. Super. 522 (N.J. Ct. App. 1959).
155 A.2d 134 (Cirasella v. Village of So. Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gabriel v. Borough of Paramus
212 A.2d 550 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)