Cipriano v. Nicholson File Co.
This text of 1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 27 (Cipriano v. Nicholson File Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony shows that the petitioner on October 17, 1916, reported to the defendant an accident which occurred to him on October 14 and also on October 16, consisting of the dropping of a heavy file on his left ankle. A very serious condition has followed this accident. The defendant, however, through his medical testimony claims that the condition of the plaintiff’s ankle on said October 17 shows a condition which must have originated a considerable time previous to October 14, and argues that the accident which was the cause of the injury must have occurred some time previous to October 14 and is one of which the company was not notified. We think, however, upon the testimony we are warranted in finding that whatever may have been the previous condition of the petitioner's ankle, it was aggravated and lightened up by the accident of October 14. The defendant’s own testimony shows that the petitioner was able to and did work 'continuously for a long . time prior to October 14, and that it was only after the injury received on that date that the ankle assumed such a serious condition that it was impossible for the petitioner to work and that he commenced to and continued to receive persistent medical and surgical attention.
We therefore find that the accidents of October 14 and 16 caused the injury to the petitioner which fixes the defendant’s liability. According to the testimony as we understand it, the defendant is therefore liable to pay the petitioner at the rate of $5.22 a week.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cipriano-v-nicholson-file-co-risuperct-1917.