Cipriani v. Jerico

449 So. 2d 994, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1984
DocketNo. 83-509
StatusPublished

This text of 449 So. 2d 994 (Cipriani v. Jerico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cipriani v. Jerico, 449 So. 2d 994, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellees entered by the trial court following the return of a jury verdict of zero damages for Cipriani. The record discloses that the injury Cipriani complained of following an automobile accident was not objectively verifiable. Thus, a jury of reasonable persons would be justified in concluding that he was not injured. Lockhart v. Prudot, 271 So.2d 157 (Fla.2d DCA 1972). Finding that the appellant has failed to [995]*995demonstrate reversible error in any of the other points raised on this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockhart v. Prudot
271 So. 2d 157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 So. 2d 994, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cipriani-v-jerico-fladistctapp-1984.