Cipriani v. Jerico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cipriani v. Jerico

449 So. 2d 994, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1984·No. No. 83-509·Published

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellees entered by the trial court following the return of a jury verdict of zero damages for Cipriani. The record discloses that the injury Cipriani complained of following an automobile accident was not objectively verifiable. Thus, a jury of reasonable persons would be justified in concluding that he was not injured. Lockhart v. Prudot, 271 So.2d 157 (Fla.2d DCA 1972). Finding that the appellant has failed to [995]*995demonstrate reversible error in any of the other points raised on this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BASKIN, Judge.

We affirm the judgment in favor of ap-pellees entered by the trial court following the return of a jury verdict of zero damages for Cipriani. The record discloses that the injury Cipriani complained of following an automobile accident was not objectively verifiable. Thus, a jury of reasonable persons would be justified in concluding that he was not injured. Lockhart v. Prudot, 271 So.2d 157 (Fla.2d DCA 1972). Finding that the appellant has failed to [995]*995demonstrate reversible error in any of the other points raised on this appeal, we affirm the judgment of the lower court.

Affirmed.

Cipriani v. Jerico, 449 So. 2d 994, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

449 So. 2d 994 (Cipriani v. Jerico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related