Cipriana Querida Williams v. State
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________
No. 07-20-00056-CR ________________________
CIPRIANA QUERIDA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No. 6500; Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding
February 21, 2020
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.
Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Appellant, Cipriana Querida Williams, was
placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for six years for possession of
marijuana1 and assessed a $6,000 fine. Appellant has filed a notice of appeal, proceeding
1 TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.121(b)(5) (West 2017). pro se, from the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication. We dismiss the appeal for
want of jurisdiction and because Appellant has no right of appeal.
The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In a
criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is
imposed or within ninety days after sentence is imposed if the defendant timely files a
motion for new trial. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, an
appellate court has no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id.
The trial court signed the order of deferred adjudication on December 11, 2018.
Because no motion for new trial was filed, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due by
January 10, 2019. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant did not file a notice of appeal until
January 14, 2020. Accordingly, her untimely filed notice of appeal prevents this court
from acquiring jurisdiction over the appeal.
Furthermore, the trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal indicates
that Appellant has waived her right of appeal. We are required by Rule of Appellate
Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has
the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.”
By letter of January 17, 2020, this court notified Appellant of the consequences of
her late notice of appeal and the trial court’s certification and invited her to demonstrate
grounds for continuing the appeal by January 31. Appellant did not file a response to the
court’s letter.
2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and based on the trial
court’s certification indicating appellant has no right of appeal.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cipriana Querida Williams v. State (Cipriana Querida Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.