Ciofalo v. Van Wart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciofalo v. Van Wart

32 A.D.2d 814, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 814 (Ciofalo v. Van Wart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciofalo v. Van Wart, 32 A.D.2d 814, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Rubinstein et al. as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman respectively in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7,th, 8th, 11th and 12th Election Districts, in the 87th and 88th Assembly Districts in the 9th Ward, City of Yonkers, petitioner and another (1) appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 10, 1969, which dismissed the petition, and (2) move to stay said election. Appeals dismissed, without costs, on motion of respondents Board of Elections and Kenneth J. Brown. Motion for stay denied. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Rubinstein et al. as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman respectively in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7,th, 8th, 11th and 12th Election Districts, in the 87th and 88th Assembly Districts in the 9th Ward, City of Yonkers, petitioner and another (1) appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 10, 1969, which dismissed the petition, and (2) move to stay said election. Appeals dismissed, without costs, on motion of respondents Board of Elections and Kenneth J. Brown. Motion for stay denied. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 814, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciofalo-v-van-wart-nyappdiv-1969.