Cintron v. People
This text of 417 P.2d 4 (Cintron v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Plaintiff in error, Michael Cintron was convicted of [278]*278possession of narcotics and conspiracy to possess narcotics. From that judgment he seeks reversal in this Court by writ of error.
Counsel representing the plaintiff in error in this Court was not counsel who represented the defendant during the trial. He frankly admits that the grounds upon which he. seeks reversal are presented for the first time in this Court and that none of the matters were brought to the attention of the trial court by “contemporary objection” during the trial and none of them were raised in the motion for a new trial.
We have read the record and find nothing therein which would move us here to grant an exception to the general rule announced by us that we will ordinarily notice only such matters as are preserved for review by proper procedure in the trial court. Lucero v. People, 158 Colo. 568, 409 P.2d 278; Brown and Glymph v. People, 158 Colo. 561, 408 P.2d 981.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice McWilliams concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 P.2d 4, 160 Colo. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cintron-v-people-colo-1966.