Cintrón v. Cruz

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Cintrón v. Cruz

7 P.R. 119

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedJune 8, 1904

DocketNo. 77

StatusPublished

This text of 7 P.R. 119 (Cintrón v. Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cintrón v. Cruz, 7 P.R. 119 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Me. Justice Figuebas,

after stating the foregoing facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings' of fact and the conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from are accepted. In view of the provisions of rule 63 of General Order No. 118, series of 1899; and the legal provisions therein cited, and the law of the Legislative Assembly of this Island approved March 12, 1903, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment rendered on August 13, 1902, by the District Court of Ponce, sustaining the complaint, as well as the other pronouncements therein contained, and we impose upon the appellant Hilario Cruz y Colón, the costs of this appeal. The original record properly certified is ordered to be returned to the district court in which it originated, for the proper purposes.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Justice Figuebas,

after stating the foregoing facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings' of fact and the conclusions of law contained in the judgment appealed from are accepted. In view of the provisions of rule 63 of General Order No. 118, series of 1899; and the legal provisions therein cited, and the law of the Legislative Assembly of this Island approved March 12, 1903, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the judgment rendered on August 13, 1902, by the District Court of Ponce, sustaining the complaint, as well as the other pronouncements therein contained, and we impose upon the appellant Hilario Cruz y Colón, the costs of this appeal. The original record properly certified is ordered to be returned to the district court in which it originated, for the proper purposes.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P.R. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cintron-v-cruz-prsupreme-1904.