Cintron, Emilio
This text of Cintron, Emilio (Cintron, Emilio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-74,514-08
EX PARTE EMILIO CINTRON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2007-CR-3983-W8 IN THE 187th DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of nine counts of
aggravated sexual assault of a child and nine counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced
to life imprisonment on each count.
In his present application, Applicant raises two grounds. This application, however, presents
a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed seven prior
applications pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to 2
raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been
presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused.
Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).
Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under
Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is
dismissed.
Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,
not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application
pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims
presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous
application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).
Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
Filed: October 14, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cintron, Emilio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cintron-emilio-texcrimapp-2015.