Cintas Corporation v. David Arrellano, Individually, D/B/A Las Comadres Restaurant

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 26, 2013
Docket13-12-00511-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Cintas Corporation v. David Arrellano, Individually, D/B/A Las Comadres Restaurant (Cintas Corporation v. David Arrellano, Individually, D/B/A Las Comadres Restaurant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cintas Corporation v. David Arrellano, Individually, D/B/A Las Comadres Restaurant, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00511-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CINTAS CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

DAVID ARELLANO, INDIVIDUALLY, D/B/A LAS COMADRES RESTAURANT, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law Number Two of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam

Appellant Cintas Corporation’s appeal is currently pending in this Court. The

record shows that Cintas Corporation properly requested that the trial court file findings of

fact and conclusions of law in support of its judgment. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 296, 297. In

requesting findings of fact and conclusions of law, Cintas Corporation timely complied with the procedure set forth in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 296 and 297. See TEX. R.

CIV. P. 296, 297. However the record on appeal shows that, to date, the trial court has

not complied with its mandatory duty to file findings of fact and conclusions of law in

support of its judgment.

We therefore ABATE the appeal and REMAND this matter to the trial court for

further proceedings consistent with this order. See Brooks v. Housing Auth. of City of El

Paso, 926 S.W.2d 316, 319 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1996, no writ) (“[W]henever possible,

appellate courts should attempt to remedy the absence of findings and conclusions by

abating the appeal and remanding to the trial judge for entry of findings and conclusions,

so that the appeal can be handled in a normal manner”); see also TEX. R. APP. P.

44.4(a)(2). Upon remand, the trial court is directed to: (1) immediately cause notice to

be given and conduct a hearing regarding findings of fact and conclusions of law; (2)

make and file appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be

included in a clerk's record; (3) cause the hearing to be transcribed and included in a

reporter's record; and (4) have these records forwarded to the Clerk of this Court within

thirty days from the date of this order. If the trial court requires additional time to comply,

the trial court should so notify the Clerk of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 26th day of September, 2013.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. Housing Authority of the City of El Paso
926 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cintas Corporation v. David Arrellano, Individually, D/B/A Las Comadres Restaurant, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cintas-corporation-v-david-arrellano-individually--texapp-2013.