Cintas Corporation v. Abel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2011·No. 17-35339·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CINTAS CORPORATION, Plan No. 07-16318 Administrator for the Cintas Partners’ Plan, D.C. No. CV-06-01781-SBA Northern District of California, Plaintiff - Appellee, Oakland

v. ORDER ROBERT J. ABEL; DAVID J. ABRAHAMSEN; NICHOLAS ACKERMAN; RANDALL ADAMS; JACK ADDISON; DONALD ADKINS; JOSEPH W. ADOLPH; BRADLEY AGLER; JASON AGOSTINI; VINCE AGOZZINO,

Defendants - Appellants.

Before: D.W. NELSON, REINHARDT, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The parties’ joint request that the above-captioned appellate proceedings be

dismissed as moot is GRANTED.

This case is hereby DISMISSED. All parties shall bear their own attorneys

fees and costs on appeal.

A certified copy of this order sent to the district court shall act as and for the

mandate of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cintas Corporation v. Abel, (9th Cir. 2011).

Cintas Corporation v. Abel (Cintas Corporation v. Abel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.