Cinquemani v. Guarino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cinquemani v. Guarino

290 A.D.2d 554, 736 N.Y.S.2d 623, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 554 (Cinquemani v. Guarino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cinquemani v. Guarino, 290 A.D.2d 554, 736 N.Y.S.2d 623, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Civil Rights Law article 6 for leave to change an infant’s surname, Anne Marie Guarino appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), dated February 27, 2001, which partially granted the father’s petition.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is denied in its entirety.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the father of the infant born out of wedlock failed to establish that the infant’s best interests will be substantially promoted by changing the infant’s surname to his surname (see, Matter of Mercado v Townsend, 225 AD2d 555). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Civil Rights Law article 6 for leave to change an infant’s surname, Anne Marie Guarino appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), dated February 27, 2001, which partially granted the father’s petition.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is denied in its entirety.

Contrary to the Supreme Court’s determination, the father of the infant born out of wedlock failed to establish that the infant’s best interests will be substantially promoted by changing the infant’s surname to his surname (see, Matter of Mercado v Townsend, 225 AD2d 555). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 554, 736 N.Y.S.2d 623, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cinquemani-v-guarino-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack