CINQUEGRANA v. Rowley

10 So. 3d 1205, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8658, 2009 WL 1766628
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2009·No. 4D08-2839·Published

Opinion

GROSS, C.J.

We reverse the circuit court’s order dismissing appellant’s complaint due to the litigation misconduct of attorney Jonathan Rotstein. In part, the dismissal was based on grounds not raised in appellee Colliers’ motion to dismiss. In his motion, appellee Rowley asked not for dismissal of the complaint, but for the imposition of lesser sanctions. Also, counsel for Rowley had deposed appellant prior to the hearing on the motion to dismiss, so one discovery issue had been resolved pri- or to dismissal. On remand, the circuit court may consider the imposition of sanctions against attorney Rotstein. In any future hearing seeking dismissal for counsel’s discovery violations, the circuit court should make express findings concerning the factors identified in Kozel v. Ostendorf 629 So.2d 817, 818 (Fla.1993). See Ham v. Dunmire, 891 So.2d 492, 500 (Fla.2004).

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CINQUEGRANA v. Rowley, 10 So. 3d 1205, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8658, 2009 WL 1766628 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

10 So. 3d 1205 (CINQUEGRANA v. Rowley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kozel v. Ostendorf
629 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Ham v. Dunmire
891 So. 2d 492 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)