Cinnante v. State
608 So. 2d 550, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1992 WL 336109
This text of 608 So. 2d 550 (Cinnante v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cinnante v. State, 608 So. 2d 550, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1992 WL 336109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
We agree with appellant that, contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830, the judgment of contempt does not include “a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt,” is based. Although a technical error, it requires a reversal and remand for correction of the judgment. Woods v. State, 600 So.2d 27 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Woods v. State
600 So. 2d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 550, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1992 WL 336109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cinnante-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.