Cinerama, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

38 A.D.2d 698, 328 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5513
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 698 (Cinerama, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cinerama, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 38 A.D.2d 698, 328 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5513 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 4, 1971, and judgment of said court, entered on September 16,1971, unanimously modified, on the law, to delete dismissal of the complaint and to declare in favor of defendant, and as so modified, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant one bill of $50 costs and disbursements of these appeals. Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 12, 1971, unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. We agree with the conclusions reached by the court at Special Term. However, in an action for a declaratory judgment the complaint should not be [699]*699dismissed if a proper ease is made out for a declaration of rights. This is so even where the indicated disposition is, as here, a declaration in favor of the defendant. No appeal from an interlocutory order lies after final judgment unless the order affects the judgment. An application for an injunction pendente lite does not affect the final judgment (Bramley v. Miller, 243 App. Div. 220). Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Founders Insurance v. Everest National Insurance
73 A.D.3d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Strnad v. Brudnicki
200 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Two Guys From Harrison-NY v. S.F.R. Realty Associates
186 A.D.2d 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 698, 328 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cinerama-inc-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-nyappdiv-1972.