Ciner v. Maluagna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ciner v. Maluagna

67 A.D.2d 961, 413 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 961 (Ciner v. Maluagna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ciner v. Maluagna, 67 A.D.2d 961, 413 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 7, 1978, which denied his motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint, and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated July 3,1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated March 7, 1978 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated July 3, 1978 reversed insofar as appealed from, and, upon reargument, motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause granted. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. It was an abuse of discretion to deny plaintiff leave to amend the ad damnum clause (see Wagner v Huntington Hosp., 65 AD2d 771). Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 7, 1978, which denied his motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint, and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated July 3,1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated March 7, 1978 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated July 3, 1978 reversed insofar as appealed from, and, upon reargument, motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause granted. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. It was an abuse of discretion to deny plaintiff leave to amend the ad damnum clause (see Wagner v Huntington Hosp., 65 AD2d 771). Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 961, 413 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ciner-v-maluagna-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack