Cindy Garcia v. Google, Inc.

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CINDY LEE GARCIA, No. 12-57302 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:12-cv-08315- MWF-VBK GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a California limited liability company, ORDER Defendants-Appellees,

and

NAKOULA BASSELEY NAKOULA, an individual, AKA Sam Bacile; MARK BASSELEY YOUSSEF; ABANOB BASSELEY NAKOULA; MATTHEW NEKOLA; AHMED HAMDY; AMAL NADA; DANIEL K. CARESMAN; KRITBAG DIFRAT; SOBHI BUSHRA; ROBERT BACILY; NICOLA BACILY; THOMAS J. TANAS; ERWIN SALAMEH; YOUSSEFF M. BASSELEY; MALID AHLAWI, Defendants.

Filed March 13, 2014

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Ronald M. Gould and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges. 2 GARCIA V. GOOGLE, INC.

ORDER

Within 21 days of the filing of this order, appellant shall file a response to the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. The response shall comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32 and Ninth Circuit Rule 40-1.

The court grants leave pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a) to any amicus wishing to file a brief bearing on the petition, so long as it is filed no later than 10 days after the filing of appellant’s response, does not exceed 2,500 words and otherwise complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.