Cincinnati v. Testa

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati v. Testa

22 N.E.3d 1094, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1428

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 7, 2015

Docket2014-0531

StatusPublished

This text of 22 N.E.3d 1094 (Cincinnati v. Testa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati v. Testa, 22 N.E.3d 1094, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1428 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2011-143 through 2011-148. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant, Paul Macke, show cause within ten days as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction for failure to timely file the notice of appeal with the Board of Tax Appeals as required by R.C. 5717.04. Appellee may file a reply to appellant’s response within ten days of the filing of the response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2011-143 through 2011-148. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that appellant, Paul Macke, show cause within ten days as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction for failure to timely file the notice of appeal with the Board of Tax Appeals as required by R.C. 5717.04. Appellee may file a reply to appellant’s response within ten days of the filing of the response.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 N.E.3d 1094, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-v-testa-ohio-2015.