Cincinnati v. Sidney

696 N.E.2d 603, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2043
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1998
Docket98-1246
StatusPublished

This text of 696 N.E.2d 603 (Cincinnati v. Sidney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati v. Sidney, 696 N.E.2d 603, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2043 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-970310. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
696 N.E.2d 603, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1476, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-v-sidney-ohio-1998.