Home/Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County/Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Dannenfelser

Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Dannenfelser

20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553
CourtCourt of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County
DecidedMay 29, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553 (Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Dannenfelser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Dannenfelser, 20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1914).

Opinion

Swing, J.,

dissenting.

I think the evidence clearly shows contributory negligence on the part of defendant in error and therefore dissent from the judgment of affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-traction-co-v-dannenfelser-ohctapp1hamilto-1914.