Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

118 Ohio St. 3d 263, 2008 WL 2228636
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 28, 2008
DocketNo. 2007-1217
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 118 Ohio St. 3d 263 (Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of Revision, 118 Ohio St. 3d 263, 2008 WL 2228636 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed on the authority of Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 106 Ohio St.3d 269, 2005-Ohio-4979, 834 N.E.2d 782, and Rhodes v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 117 Ohio St.3d 532, 2008-Ohio-1595, 885 N.E.2d 236.

David C. DiMuzio, Inc., and David C. DiMuzio, for appellee Cincinnati School District Board of Education. Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Scheve, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee Hamilton County Auditor. Siegel, Siegel, Johnson & Jennings Co., L.P.A., Nicholas M.J. Ray, and Jay P. Siegel, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Target Corp. v. Greene County Board of Revision
2009 Ohio 2492 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 Ohio St. 3d 263, 2008 WL 2228636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-school-district-board-of-education-v-hamilton-county-board-of-ohio-2008.