Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision
923 N.E.2d 1157, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1527
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Ohio 4907 →
Opinion
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-A-1196. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the motion of Fenco Development Co. and Craig Fennel for continuance of oral argument before a master commissioner scheduled for April 1, 2010,
It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 923 N.E.2d 1157, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1527 (Ohio 2010).
923 N.E.2d 1157 (Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.