Cincinnati, Peru, & Chicago Railroad v. Emrick

19 Ind. 289
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1862
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ind. 289 (Cincinnati, Peru, & Chicago Railroad v. Emrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati, Peru, & Chicago Railroad v. Emrick, 19 Ind. 289 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These cases appear to have been instituted at the. same time, and to be similar, in all respects, to that of the same appellants v. Cochran, 17 Ind. 516. The decision in that determines these cases. The record, in each case, is so confused, that we are not able to determine, certainly, whether the judgment is within the power of the Court, upon the record presented. It was ordered, etc., that a deed from the appellee to the railroad company, be set aside, etc., and yet, the better opinion would seem to be, from said record, that the parts of the complaint by which that end [290]*290was sought, were dismissed, and a different remedy prayed for.

John W. Pettit and Galvin Gowgill, for the appellants in each case. John Brownlee, for the appellee in each case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. Cochran
17 Ind. 516 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1861)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ind. 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-peru-chicago-railroad-v-emrick-ind-1862.