Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Lovell's Admr.
This text of 142 Ky. 1 (Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Lovell's Admr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Modification of Opinion.
E. J. McCarty,
the engineer of the train of which Cruise was the conductor, was a defendant in this action, and a joint judgment was rendered against him, Cruise and the railway company. The evidence does not show that McCarty was guilty of negligence, and therefore the motion on his behalf for a peremptory instruction should have been sustained. So much of the opinion as directs a judgment against McCarty is withdrawn; and the judgment as to him is reversed with directions for a new trial in conformity with the principles announced in the opinion.
Petition for rehearing overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 Ky. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-new-orleans-texas-pacific-ry-co-v-lovells-admr-kyctapp-1911.