Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Tate

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1910·No. No. 11082·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on the ground that the case should have been submitted to the jury.

Crew, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.

As to the other grounds of error the judgment of reversal is not affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Spear, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Tate, 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396 (Ohio 1910).

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396 (Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Tate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.