Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Tate

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1910
DocketNo. 11082
StatusPublished

This text of 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396 (Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Tate, 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396 (Ohio 1910).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed on the ground that the case should have been submitted to the jury.

Crew, Spear and Price, JJ., concur.

As to the other grounds of error the judgment of reversal is not affirmed.

Summers, C. J., Spear, Shauck and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-new-orleans-texas-pacific-railway-co-v-tate-ohio-1910.