Cincinnati Milacron Ltd. v. M/V American Legend
This text of 793 F.2d 104 (Cincinnati Milacron Ltd. v. M/V American Legend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On Petition for Rehearing
The appellees’ petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Chief Judge Winter, Judges Russell, Widener, Hall, Phillips, Murna-ghan and Chapman voted to rehear the case in banc; and Judges Sprouse, Ervin and Wilkinson voted against rehearing the case in banc. A majority of judges having voted to grant rehearing in banc,
Judge Sneeden left the Court prior to a request for a poll on the suggestion for rehearing in banc and Judge McMillan was not entitled to vote on this issue.
IT IS ORDERED that rehearing in banc is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be calendared for argument at the October session of Court.
Entered at the direction of Judge Ervin.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
793 F.2d 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-milacron-ltd-v-mv-american-legend-ca4-1986.