Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street Railroad v. Leonard

73 N.E. 932, 35 Ind. App. 268, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 84
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 7, 1905
DocketNo. 5,228
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 73 N.E. 932 (Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street Railroad v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati, Lawrenceburg & Aurora Electric Street Railroad v. Leonard, 73 N.E. 932, 35 Ind. App. 268, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 84 (Ind. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

Robt, J.

Appellee was a passenger on one of appellant’s electric cars, which collided with another car going in the opposite direction upon the same track. By the force of the collision the seat on which appellee was sitting was “knocked off.” He was thrown through an open door, and, as he testified, “fell, and felt an awful jar on my right arm and breast.” He further testified: “I went to Dr. House’s office. I did not know where I was hurt, I was bruised up so, so he wrapped up both arms. Applied arnica. I suffered pain a long while. If I sleep on this side I have a severe pain all night. It hurts me. My arm has been crooked ever since. My chest hurts me when I am exhausted carrying iron in these ladles.”

The only cause appellant assigns for a reversal of the judgment is that “the damage assessed by the verdict is excessive.”

1. The jury were authorized to fix such sum as would compensate the appellee not only’for loss of time, blit for pain, mental anguish, permanent disability, if any, and to “take into account the peril, if any there was, to plaintiff’s life.”

2. The appellee’s damage was fixed by the jury at $200. The court rendered judgment upon this verdict, which does not seem to this court to be excessive.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton, Harris & Co. v. Larrimer
105 N.E. 43 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1914)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lynch
87 N.E. 40 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 N.E. 932, 35 Ind. App. 268, 1905 Ind. App. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-lawrenceburg-aurora-electric-street-railroad-v-leonard-indctapp-1905.