Cincinnati Insurance v. Estate of McClain

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Insurance v. Estate of McClain

98 Ohio St. 3d 492

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 2003·No. No. 2002-0641·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

{¶ 1} On motion for summary reversal. Appellant’s motion for summary reversal is granted. This cause is remanded to the trial court to consider whether the insurer was prejudiced under Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mut. Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 186, 2002-Ohio-7217, 781 N.E.2d 927.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} On motion for summary reversal. Appellant’s motion for summary reversal is granted. This cause is remanded to the trial court to consider whether the insurer was prejudiced under Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mut. Ins. Co., 98 Ohio St.3d 186, 2002-Ohio-7217, 781 N.E.2d 927.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. Cook, J., not participating.

Cincinnati Insurance v. Estate of McClain, 98 Ohio St. 3d 492 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

98 Ohio St. 3d 492 (Cincinnati Insurance v. Estate of McClain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related