Cincinnati Ins. v. CPS Holdings, Inc.

850 N.E.2d 71, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1410

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cincinnati Ins. v. CPS Holdings, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 110 Ohio St. 3d 1454 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 2006·No. 2006-0722·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85967 and 85969, 2006-Ohio-713. Discretionary appeal of Cincinnati Insurance Company accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal of Cincinnati Insurance Company on all other Propositions of Law. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal of Gulf Insurance Company not accepted.

Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 85967 and 85969, 2006-Ohio-713. Discretionary appeal of Cincinnati Insurance Company accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal of Cincinnati Insurance Company on all other Propositions of Law. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal of Gulf Insurance Company not accepted.

Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Cincinnati Ins. v. CPS Holdings, Inc., 850 N.E.2d 71, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1410 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

850 N.E.2d 71 (Cincinnati Ins. v. CPS Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Cincinnati Ins. v. Cps Holdings, Unpublished Decision (2-16-2006)

2006 Ohio 713 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Opinion

Related