Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Torok

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Torok

794 N.E.2d 682, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1530

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 28, 2003

Docket2003-0864

StatusPublished

This text of 794 N.E.2d 682 (Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Torok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Torok, 794 N.E.2d 682, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1530 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Jefferson App. No. 01-JE-24, 2003-0hio-1764. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On May 14, 2003, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals, and pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause within 10 days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jefferson App. No. 01-JE-24, 2003-0hio-1764. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On May 14, 2003, appellants filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals, and pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellants have neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellants show cause within 10 days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. 111(6).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

794 N.E.2d 682, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-ins-co-v-torok-ohio-2003.