Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody

355 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 1978

DocketNo. 77-2031

StatusPublished

This text of 355 So. 2d 170 (Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody, 355 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant suffered a Summary Judgment and has appealed. Because we find there were factual issues raised in the answer precluding the entry of the Summary Judgment we must reverse. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Kash ‘N’ Karry Wholesale Supermarkets, Inc. v. Garcia, 221 So.2d 786 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); Egan v. Washington General Insurance Corporation, 240 So.2d 875 (Fla.4th DCA 1970).

REVERSED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant suffered a Summary Judgment and has appealed. Because we find there were factual issues raised in the answer precluding the entry of the Summary Judgment we must reverse. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Kash ‘N’ Karry Wholesale Supermarkets, Inc. v. Garcia, 221 So.2d 786 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); Egan v. Washington General Insurance Corporation, 240 So.2d 875 (Fla.4th DCA 1970).

REVERSED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-ins-co-v-moody-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack