Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody
355 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961
Opinion
Appellant suffered a Summary Judgment and has appealed. Because we find there were factual issues raised in the answer precluding the entry of the Summary Judgment we must reverse. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Kash ‘N’ Karry Wholesale Supermarkets, Inc. v. Garcia, 221 So.2d 786 (Fla.3d DCA 1969); Egan v. Washington General Insurance Corporation, 240 So.2d 875 (Fla.4th DCA 1970).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody, 355 So. 2d 170, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).
355 So. 2d 170 (Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Moody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Egan v. Washington General Insurance Corporation
240 So. 2d 875 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Kash N'Karry Wholesale Supermarkets, Inc. v. Garcia
221 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)