Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Heritage Buffing & Polishing, Inc.

1993 Ohio 213
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 27, 1993
Docket1992-1032
StatusPublished

This text of 1993 Ohio 213 (Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Heritage Buffing & Polishing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Heritage Buffing & Polishing, Inc., 1993 Ohio 213 (Ohio 1993).

Opinion

OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Cincinnati Insurance Company et al., Appellees, v. Heritage Buffing and Polishing, Inc., Appellant. [Cite as Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Heritage Buffing & Polishing, Inc. (1993), Ohio St.3d .] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 92-1032 -- Submitted June 3, 1993 -- Decided July 28, 1993.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Fairfield County, No. 29-CA-91.

Lane, Alton & Horst and Mary McWilliams Dengler, for appellees. R.C. Stoughton, Sr. Co., L.P.A., and R.C. Stoughton, Sr., for appellant.

This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent and would reverse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1993 Ohio 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-ins-co-v-heritage-buffing-polishing-inc-ohio-1993.