Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Myers & Patty Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Myers & Patty Co.

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 417

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 19, 1910

DocketNo. 11749

StatusPublished

This text of 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 417 (Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Myers & Patty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. Myers & Patty Co., 82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 417 (Ohio 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, the judgment of the court of common pleas in said cause is hereby reversed and the original petition of The Myers & Patty Company, defendants in error, is dismissed upon the ground that the undisputed evidence showed that considering1 the difference in the situation of the parties there was no discrimination for which the plaintiff in error was liable.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Davis and Sitauck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which said circuit court should have rendered, the judgment of the court of common pleas in said cause is hereby reversed and the original petition of The Myers & Patty Company, defendants in error, is dismissed upon the ground that the undisputed evidence showed that considering1 the difference in the situation of the parties there was no discrimination for which the plaintiff in error was liable.

Summers, C. J., Crew, Davis and Sitauck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 Ohio St. (N.S.) 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-hamilton-dayton-railway-co-v-myers-patty-co-ohio-1910.