Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCollum
245 U.S. 632, 38 S. Ct. 64, 62 L. Ed. 521, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1711
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 26, 1917
DocketNo. 57
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 245 U.S. 632 (Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCollum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCollum, 245 U.S. 632, 38 S. Ct. 64, 62 L. Ed. 521, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1711 (1917).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 52, 53; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 235; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 240 U. S. 518.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
FAIRCHILD, PROSECUTING ATTY., ETC. v. Schanke
113 N.E.2d 159 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
245 U.S. 632, 38 S. Ct. 64, 62 L. Ed. 521, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-hamilton-dayton-railway-co-v-mccollum-scotus-1917.