Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. Harter
26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 426
Opinion
A deed executed by the president of a railroad company in due form, under the seal of the corporation, and delivered, will be presumed to have been authorized by the directors; and the mere fact that such authority is not found on their minutes will not rebut the-presumption.
Leave refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. Harter, 26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 426 (Ohio 1875).
26 Ohio St. (N.S.) 426 (Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. Harter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.