Cincinnati Companies v. Albers

103 Ohio St. 3d 475
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2004·No. No. 2004-0544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., 103 Ohio St.3d 170, 2004-Ohio-4885, 814 N.E.2d 1195.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Robert W. Kerpsack Co., L.P.A., and Robert W. Kerpsack, for appellants. Utrecht & Young, L.L.C., and James D. Utrecht, for appellee Cincinnati Casualty Company. Freund, Freeze & Arnold, Christopher W. Carrigg and Jamey T. Pregón, for appellee Republic Franklin Insurance Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Companies v. Albers, 103 Ohio St. 3d 475 (Ohio 2004).

103 Ohio St. 3d 475 (Cincinnati Companies v. Albers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Indiana Ins. Co. v. Fox, Unpublished Decision (3-11-2005)
2005 Ohio 1040 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)