Cincinnati Companies v. Albers

103 Ohio St. 3d 475
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 2004
DocketNo. 2004-0544
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 Ohio St. 3d 475 (Cincinnati Companies v. Albers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Companies v. Albers, 103 Ohio St. 3d 475 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., 103 Ohio St.3d 170, 2004-Ohio-4885, 814 N.E.2d 1195.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Robert W. Kerpsack Co., L.P.A., and Robert W. Kerpsack, for appellants. Utrecht & Young, L.L.C., and James D. Utrecht, for appellee Cincinnati Casualty Company. Freund, Freeze & Arnold, Christopher W. Carrigg and Jamey T. Pregón, for appellee Republic Franklin Insurance Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Indiana Ins. Co. v. Fox, Unpublished Decision (3-11-2005)
2005 Ohio 1040 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ohio St. 3d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-companies-v-albers-ohio-2004.