Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford

Hamilton Circuit Court

Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 322

DecidedDecember 4, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170 (Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford, 13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 322 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

An action under Section 1536-136, Revised Statutes, to recover from a city compensation for a turnpike included within the corporate limits, is under the code, not local, but transitory in character, and must be brought in the county where the defendant resides or may be sumoned. The defendant in error is situated partly in two counties,- but has its situs in Clermont county, where it must be sued in such action. City of Fostoria v. Fox, 60 O. S., 340.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An action under Section 1536-136, Revised Statutes, to recover from a city compensation for a turnpike included within the corporate limits, is under the code, not local, but transitory in character, and must be brought in the county where the defendant resides or may be sumoned. The defendant in error is situated partly in two counties,- but has its situs in Clermont county, where it must be sued in such action. City of Fostoria v. Fox, 60 O. S., 340.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-columbus-wooster-turnpike-co-v-village-of-milford-ohcircthamilton-1909.