Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford

Hamilton Circuit Court

Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 322

Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided December 4, 1909·Published

Opinion

An action under Section 1536-136, Revised Statutes, to recover from a city compensation for a turnpike included within the corporate limits, is under the code, not local, but transitory in character, and must be brought in the county where the defendant resides or may be sumoned. The defendant in error is situated partly in two counties,- but has its situs in Clermont county, where it must be sued in such action. City of Fostoria v. Fox, 60 O. S., 340.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An action under Section 1536-136, Revised Statutes, to recover from a city compensation for a turnpike included within the corporate limits, is under the code, not local, but transitory in character, and must be brought in the county where the defendant resides or may be sumoned. The defendant in error is situated partly in two counties,- but has its situs in Clermont county, where it must be sued in such action. City of Fostoria v. Fox, 60 O. S., 340.

Judgment affirmed.

Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford, 13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170, 1909 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 322 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Pincite

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 170 (Cincinnati, Columbus & Wooster Turnpike Co. v. Village of Milford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.