Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch
This text of 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498 (Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On rehearing. Former judgment adhered to. See journal entry.
This court finds that the said traction company is not entitled to enforce the subscription contract sued on against the defendant in error. The record does not disclose that there are any outstanding-unpaid debts of the corporation and the rights of-creditors are not involved in this proceeding.
It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered herein [92 Ohio St., 540] be, and the same is, adhered to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-columbus-traction-co-v-burch-ohio-1916.