Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 25, 1916·No. No. 14726·Published

Opinion

On rehearing. Former judgment adhered to. See journal entry.

This court finds that the said traction company is not entitled to enforce the subscription contract sued on against the defendant in error. The record does not disclose that there are any outstanding-unpaid debts of the corporation and the rights of-creditors are not involved in this proceeding.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered herein [92 Ohio St., 540] be, and the same is, adhered to.

Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Newman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On rehearing. Former judgment adhered to. See journal entry.

This court finds that the said traction company is not entitled to enforce the subscription contract sued on against the defendant in error. The record does not disclose that there are any outstanding-unpaid debts of the corporation and the rights of-creditors are not involved in this proceeding.

It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered herein [92 Ohio St., 540] be, and the same is, adhered to.

Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker and Newman, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch, 93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498 (Ohio 1916).

Pincite

93 Ohio St. (N.S.) 498 (Cincinnati & Columbus Traction Co. v. Burch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.