Cincinnati Builders Supply Co. v. Gran

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Cincinnati Builders Supply Co. v. Gran

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835

CourtCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

DecidedNovember 7, 1923

DocketNo. 184703

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835 (Cincinnati Builders Supply Co. v. Gran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Builders Supply Co. v. Gran, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

MATTHEWS, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Gran entered into a contract with the County .Commissioners' to furnish certain work and material in improving a road. Sullivan and Henkel c x". cuted a bond as sureties for Gran. The bond provides that if Gran shall perform the terms of the cont: act, the obligation shall be void. The contract provided that Gran should furnish all necessary labor and material. Builders Supply Co. furn’shed material' to Gran for this work and this action is to recover the ■ contract price of this material against Gran as principal' and Sullivan and Henkel as sureties: By, statute, commissioners are required, subject to fine, to exact a bond protecting laborers and material men. In overruling the demurrer to the petition, the court held;

1. A contractor’s bond, when possible, will be presumed to have been executed in compliance with the statute requiring the protection of laborers and material man. The language of this bond is susceptible of th’s construction, 100 OS. 373.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTHEWS, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Gran entered into a contract with the County .Commissioners' to furnish certain work and material in improving a road. Sullivan and Henkel c x". cuted a bond as sureties for Gran. The bond provides that if Gran shall perform the terms of the cont: act, the obligation shall be void. The contract provided that Gran should furnish all necessary labor and material. Builders Supply Co. furn’shed material' to Gran for this work and this action is to recover the ■ contract price of this material against Gran as principal' and Sullivan and Henkel as sureties: By, statute, commissioners are required, subject to fine, to exact a bond protecting laborers and material men. In overruling the demurrer to the petition, the court held;

1. A contractor’s bond, when possible, will be presumed to have been executed in compliance with the statute requiring the protection of laborers and material man. The language of this bond is susceptible of th’s construction, 100 OS. 373.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-builders-supply-co-v-gran-ohctcomplhamilt-1923.