Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

689 N.E.2d 46, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 215
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1998
Docket97-779
StatusPublished

This text of 689 N.E.2d 46 (Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 689 N.E.2d 46, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 215 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Public Utilities Commission, No. 95-845-TP-COI. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss’ sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, dissents. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 N.E.2d 46, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1424, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bell-tel-co-v-pub-util-comm-ohio-1998.