Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

675 N.E.2d 1248, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1408, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 485
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 1997
Docket97-26
StatusPublished

This text of 675 N.E.2d 1248 (Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 675 N.E.2d 1248, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1408, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 485 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Public Utilities Commission, No. 95-845-TP-COI. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 N.E.2d 1248, 78 Ohio St. 3d 1408, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bell-tel-co-v-pub-util-comm-ohio-1997.