Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young

96 Ohio St. 3d 1206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Ohio St. 3d 306
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 2002·No. No. 1999-2308·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} On July 16, 2002, respondent, David J. Young, filed an application for termination of probation. On August 7, 2002, relator filed a notice of respondent’s completion of monitored probation. Upon consideration thereof, the court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), and with its order dated January 15, 2002, in which the court reinstated respondent and placed him on monitored probation.

{¶ 2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of respondent, David J. Young, Attorney Registration No. 0009850, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated.

{¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 4} For earlier cases, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Young (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 306, 731 N.E.2d 631, and Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Young (2002), 94 Ohio St.3d 1424, 761 N.E.2d 42.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young, 96 Ohio St. 3d 1206 (Ohio 2002).

96 Ohio St. 3d 1206 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young
731 N.E.2d 631 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Young
761 N.E.2d 42 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)