Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber

691 N.E.2d 293, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 792
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 17, 1998
Docket98-386
StatusPublished

This text of 691 N.E.2d 293 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber, 691 N.E.2d 293, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 792 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

This case was filed on February 25, 1998, upon the filing of a certified report under Gov.Bar R. V(6)(L), by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (the “board”). The report named both Robert W. Worth and Donald L. Weber as respondents. Upon review of the board’s certified report, it appears that the complaint against respondent Donald L. Weber had been dismissed by the board, and therefore Donald L. Weber should not have been included as a respondent in a case filed in this court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case involving Donald L. Weber be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
691 N.E.2d 293, 81 Ohio St. 3d 1475, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-weber-ohio-1998.