Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber

581 N.E.2d 519, 62 Ohio St. 3d 222, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2887
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 1991·No. No. 91-858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent committed the disciplinary violations found by the board, but modify its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded, and we order that restitution be made consistent with the board’s opinion, but within sixty days of the date of this order. Failure to make restitution will result in respondent’s immediate suspension from the practice of law in Ohio until such payment is made. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber, 581 N.E.2d 519, 62 Ohio St. 3d 222, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2887 (Ohio 1991).

581 N.E.2d 519 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Weber
589 N.E.2d 1331 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)