Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Tekulve

610 N.E.2d 980, 66 Ohio St. 3d 164, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 836
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 1993·No. No. 92-2167·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the testimony and exhibits, we concur in the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Tekulve, 610 N.E.2d 980, 66 Ohio St. 3d 164, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 836 (Ohio 1993).

610 N.E.2d 980 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Tekulve) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Tekulve
634 N.E.2d 623 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)