Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer

2010 Ohio 3990, 932 N.E.2d 333, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1226

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 20, 2010

Docket2003-1109

StatusPublished

This text of 2010 Ohio 3990 (Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer, 2010 Ohio 3990, 932 N.E.2d 333, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1226 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Joni Elizabeth Statzer, Attorney Registration No. 0067179, last known business address in Nampa, Idaho.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 29, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent until board costs plus accrued interest are paid in full, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Statzer, 110 Ohio St.3d 1402, 2006-Ohio-3295, 850 N.E.2d 65.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lan-zinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI