Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Smith

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 452

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 1, 1963·No. D. D. No. 37·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This court, from a consideration of the record, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its recommendation. Therefore, the objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered suspending respondent for an indefinite period from the practice of law.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This court, from a consideration of the record, is of the opinion that the board was neither in error nor unreasonable in its recommendation. Therefore, the objections to the recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered suspending respondent for an indefinite period from the practice of law.

Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.

Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Smith, 174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 452 (Ohio 1963).

Pincite

174 Ohio St. (N.S.) 452 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related