Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz

607 N.E.2d 438, 66 Ohio St. 3d 4

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 1993·No. No. 92-1704·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. After the first year of the suspension is completed, respondent shall be placed on monitored probation for the balance of the sanction. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent and would impose an indefinite suspension on respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. After the first year of the suspension is completed, respondent shall be placed on monitored probation for the balance of the sanction. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent and would impose an indefinite suspension on respondent.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz, 607 N.E.2d 438, 66 Ohio St. 3d 4 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

607 N.E.2d 438 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Shabazz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related