Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. McConnell

428 N.E.2d 414, 68 Ohio St. 2d 60, 22 Ohio Op. 3d 263, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 619

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1981·No. D.D. No. 81-16·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We conclude there are sufficient facts to find that respondent violated DR 6-101 (A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

We concur with the board’s recommendation herein and hereby indefinitely suspend the respondent, Terrance A. McConnell, from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We conclude there are sufficient facts to find that respondent violated DR 6-101 (A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

We concur with the board’s recommendation herein and hereby indefinitely suspend the respondent, Terrance A. McConnell, from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Krupansky, JJ., concur.

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. McConnell, 428 N.E.2d 414, 68 Ohio St. 2d 60, 22 Ohio Op. 3d 263, 1981 Ohio LEXIS 619 (Ohio 1981).

Pincite

428 N.E.2d 414 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. McConnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.