Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marsick

702 N.E.2d 1209, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1215
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 1998·No. No. 97-2257·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Philip J. Marsick, a.k.a. Philip John Marsick, Jr., Attorney Registration No. 0018685, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of April 29, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Philip J. Marsick, a.k.a. Philip John Marsick, Jr., be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Marsick (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 551, 692 N.E.2d 991.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marsick, 702 N.E.2d 1209, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 1998).

702 N.E.2d 1209 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Marsick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Marsick
1998 Ohio 326 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)